 | @Wyatt Cheng thank you!(1) | Category: GeneralJune-12-2013 11:12 AM PDT (10 years ago)  |
| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDH6-pisfEc ^ check out he's interview. As a long term Demon Hunter I was happy to hear you recognizing that this class needs some buffs. I think that we're all waiting for you guys to announce some serious buffs and re-work in the DH game mechanics. You were talking about adding more affixes in gloves. But haven't you guys though off adding more interesting affixes in shoulders, bracers, belts and boots? Mainly rare belts and boots. Only a very tiny population of players of the game uses this items of this two types. | ||
 | @Wyatt Cheng thank you!(12) | June-12-2013 3:29 PM PDT (10 years ago) |
I hadn't seen part two, so I do feel a little better about the DH prospects now. I'm convinced Wyatt gets whats wrong, but how much they actually fix is something else. Since you missed the first part, just going to point out that you can find all three segments of the chat here: http://us.battle.net/d3/en/blog/9773964/ Similarly, both diablo.somepage and Diablo IncGamers put together pretty amazing transcripts (if you prefer reading over watching). The transcript from IncGamers covers the major themes from the interview, while the transcript from diablo.somepage is a little more comprehensive, covering every line of dialogue exchanged between the developers and Archon. Pick your poison! I wish they would do another one of those. Already working on it. :) | ||
| @Wyatt Cheng thank you!(14) | June-12-2013 3:55 PM PDT (10 years ago) |
Whatever happened to Wyatt's remarks at GDC 2013? Sounds like a community interest thing that a Community Manager might track down for the game community. The content is up on the GDC Vault, but the video of the presentation itself requires that you be a GDC member to view (that's a restriction on GDC's end, unfortunately, not ours). | ||
| @Wyatt Cheng thank you!(21) | June-12-2013 4:42 PM PDT (10 years ago) |
Funny how a positive thread with a D3 dev's name in it doesn't get deleted. Yet the second a constructive criticism thread is posted with the same names it gets deleted. Link me one? That criteria alone isn't reason enough for a thread to be removed. Constructive criticism is totally fine. Threads that include personal attacks, devolve into arguments and mud slinging, or are created simply to troll the community, however, are all candidates to be locked or removed. | ||
| @Wyatt Cheng thank you!(31) | June-12-2013 5:02 PM PDT (10 years ago) |
With all respect, I can't link them because... they were deleted? Links to deleted threads still actually exist, they'll just to point a "post has been deleted" page. It does require that you have the URL, though. If you see any examples, let me know. Like I said, constructive threads with slightly deviant titles shouldn't be deleted (in most cases, we'll just change the title if the content is otherwise okay). | ||
| @Wyatt Cheng thank you!(33) | June-12-2013 5:07 PM PDT (10 years ago) |
Use your head a little bit. It's "frowned upon" because they want to promote positive discussion, not inspire a bunch of nerd-ragers to directly shout at/insult GMs/devs personally. If it's a positive point, of course it's moot, because there is no element of abuse. Seems pretty obvious. Word. | ||
